87: Your Brain on Making

August 06, 2026

Your Brain on Making

When you feel anxious or overwhelmed or just flat - what do you reach for? Most people reach for something easy. The phone. The remote. Something mindless. And most people find it doesn't really help. They put the phone down twenty minutes later feeling roughly the same. Sometimes worse.

There's a documented reason for that. And the solution the research points toward is the exact opposite of what most wellness content recommends.

This episode goes deep into the neuroscience of what making things with your hands actually does for your brain and body - starting with neuroscientist Kelly Lambert's research on effort-based rewards, the specific neurochemical signal the brain evolved to receive from physical effort that produces a visible result, and why engineering that activity out of modern daily life has contributed to the rise in depression and anxiety. It also covers Csikszentmihalyi's flow research from a new angle - why the challenge has to match or push against your current capacity for flow to happen, and why comfortable repetition and genuine pursuit produce completely different neurological outcomes. And it ends with behavioral activation - the documented finding that action precedes motivation, not the other way around - and what that means for every maker who has ever said "I don't feel like it."

The VirginiaLeighStudio Home page:

https://www.virginialeighstudio.com

The Fabric & Fiber Studio:

https://www.virginialeighstudio.com/thestudio

Chapters

00:00 - What Do You Reach For?

02:07 - Kelly Lambert and Effort-Based Rewards

04:29 - What Fiber and Textile Making Does to Your Brain Specifically

05:20 - Lambert's Research on Mood, Behavior and the Blah Nobody Can Explain

06:27 - Fine Motor Skills and Cognitive Reserve Over Time

06:54 - Flow Research: The Angle That Didn't Come Up Before

08:43 - Comfortable Repetition vs Genuine Pursuit: Different Results in the Brain

09:09 - A Personal Account: What Complex Work Did During a Health Crisis

11:30 - Behavioral Activation: Action Comes Before Motivation

13:18 - The Choice You're Making Whether You Know It or Not

14:50 - Pick the Harder Project

Connect with Virginia:

Website = https://www.virginialeighstudio.com

Instagram = https://www.instagram.com/virginialeighstudio/

Facebook = https://www.facebook.com/virginialeighstudio

Episode Transcript

Episode 87: Transcript
Let me ask you something.
When you feel anxious or overwhelmed or just - flat - what do you reach for? Be honest. Most people reach for something easy. Something that requires nothing from them. The phone. The remote. Something mindless that gives the brain somewhere to go besides the thing it's chewing on.
And here's the thing about that. Most people find it doesn't really help. They put the phone down twenty minutes later feeling roughly the same. Sometimes worse. And they have no idea why.
I do. And it changed how I think about what I do in the studio and why.
There is a neuroscientist named Kelly Lambert. She’s been making an argument for years that most of the wellness conversation completely ignores. And I want to start with it because I think it will help clarify my whole point.
Lambert's research is on what she calls ‘effort-based rewards.’ What that means is that the human brain evolved to receive a very specific neurochemical signal - dopamine and serotonin - from a very specific kind of activity. Physical effort that produces a visible result. That could be something you made. Something you grew. Something you built or repaired with your hands. That combination - effort plus visible result - triggers a reward response in the brain that passive consumption simply does not. And what I mean by passive consumption is – scrolling, YouTube videos, TV shows – you know, consuming where you don’t have to do anything but sit there and watch.
For most of human history this wasn't a problem anyone had to deal with. You grew food. You built shelter. You made clothing. You repaired things. Effort-based activity was just a part of normal daily life. The brain got the signal constantly.
And then we modernized all of that out. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for a little modernization and convenience. But now, we buy everything already made. We fix nothing. We grow nothing. We build nothing with our hands in the course of a normal day. And Lambert's argument - backed by her research - is that the rise in depression and anxiety in modern life is due, in part, to exactly that. We removed the effort part and expected the reward to stay put. It didn't.
Now here is where this gets interesting as far as what we do.
Making fiber and textile work is one of the most complete versions of effort-based reward available to a human being right now. It takes fine motor skills. Visual assessment. Tactile feedback. Active problem solving. And a visible result at the end of it that you can touch and wear and use. That’s not a hobby. That’s a neurological event. Your brain is getting the signal it was built for. And when you choose not to make - when you choose the phone or the remote instead - your brain is not getting that signal. Those are not equivalent choices. The research is pretty clear about that.
Lambert didn't just stop at brain chemistry though. She studied what happens to mood and behavior when effort-based activity is removed from daily life and what happens when it's reintroduced. There's a specific thread in her work about how the absence of effort-based rewards creates a kind of low-grade dissatisfaction that people often can't explain. They just feel vaguely off. Not depressed exactly. Not anxious exactly. Just blah. Which is exactly the feeling I mentioned at the beginning. That connection is important- the blah-ness or disconnect most people try to fix by scrolling is caused by the absence of the very thing they're avoiding – the making, the effort, the work!
And there’s one more thing worth mentioning here. The persistent use of fine motor skills - the kind required by hand work, weaving, detailed textile construction - has a documented relationship with cognitive reserve over time. Using your hands at a high level isn't just about making something great. It's also maintaining the brain that carries you through the rest of your life.
Lambert's work connects directly to something else I've covered before -
Csikszentmihalyi's flow research - which I covered in more depth a few episodes back - adds something specific here that I didn't get into then.
Flow happens when the challenge matches or pushes against your current capacity. Not when the task is unfamiliar necessarily - but when it genuinely demands something from you. For someone newer to the craft that might mean learning a new technique. For someone with thirty years behind them it might mean a construction problem complex enough that they have to bring everything they’ve got to it. The task has to require your full attention. Easy enough to be achievable. Hard enough that you can't phone it in.
The key word in all of this is ‘challenging.’ The task has to test the edge of your current capability for flow to happen. For me, the differentiator is the complexity and the amount of focus it requires of me personally. Even though I have all but mastered everything there is in sewing, the fact that the project is testing my edges is what brings me into flow. It's not something I don’t know how to do. I know it in spades. It's almost like an "Okay, let's see what you've got, Virginia. Comfortable repetition and genuine pursuit of better produce completely different results. In the brain and in how you feel afterward.
Which means the maker who keeps choosing the safe project - the one well within their comfort zone, the pattern they've made twenty times - probably isn't getting there. That’s because the work isn't asking enough of them.
The practice does what the research says it does when the project is actually testing what you've got.
I want to tell you something personal here.
There was a period in my life when I was dealing with some significant health issues. Heart stuff. The kind of thing that hands your brain a constant supply of things to worry about if you let it. And I found out something during that time that I have never forgotten.
Mindless activity didn't help. I'd try to watch something, scroll through something, do something that required nothing from me. And the brain just kept going. It would wander right back to the worry and panic because there was nothing holding it anywhere else. The anxiety had all the room it needed.
What actually helped was getting into the studio and working on something complex. Something that needed my full attention. A complicated construction problem. Learning a new medium. Something where I had to actually think about what I was doing or it wouldn't work. And what happened in those sessions was not that I forgot about the health stuff. It's that the brain had somewhere specific to be. It had a problem in front of it that required the thinking. And it couldn't be in two places at once.
That’s not a metaphor. That is exactly what Lambert's research describes. The effort-based activity pulls the neurological resources toward the task. The catastrophizing loses its grip not because you were able to control it but because the brain got engaged with something else.
I have always kept something complex on the worktable. Always. Because the focused attention that complexity requires is one of the best tools I’ve found for managing the noise. The anxiety. The low-grade hum of worry that is just part of being a person right now. The studio is not where I go to relax. It's where I go to be fully present in something that needs and pulls my attention. And that is a completely different thing. The relaxation happens as a byproduct.
Now here is the most practical and valuable piece of research in this whole conversation. Yes, I know. I've cited three researchers in one episode. But stay with me because this last one is the one that might actually change what you do tomorrow morning.
This one takes away an excuse I'm pretty sure you've used. I have.
It’s called ‘Behavioral activation.’ That’s the finding that action precedes motivation. Not the other way around.
Most people operate on the assumption that you feel like doing something and then you do it. You wait for the feeling like it, the motivation to show up and then you act on it. And if the motivation doesn't show up you don't do anything.
This piece of research shows that is backwards. Doing the thing produces the feeling of wanting to do it. You sit down at the machine when you don't feel like it and ten minutes in you feel like it. The motivation is a result of the action not a prerequisite for it.
Every experienced maker already knows this from direct experience even without the research giving it a name. The session you least wanted to start is often the one that produces the most. You had to drag yourself in. And then something happened and you looked up and two hours had gone by.
That's not magic, folks! That's ‘behavioral activation’ doing exactly what it’s supposed to do.
So. I don't feel like it is not a legitimate reason to skip the practice, the thing. Listen Carefully. It’s a description of a mental state that the practice, the work, is specifically designed to change.
Oh goodness, let’s do that again! The “I don’t feel like it” feeling is just a declaration of a mental state that stepping in and starting is designed to change.
Waiting to ‘feel like it’ is simply a choice not to act. That choice is being made repeatedly by people who believe they are simply responding to how they feel. They're not. They're choosing the passive option and reporting the result as if it was something that happened to them rather than something that they caused to happen.
Now - that is not the same as ignoring what your body actually needs. There are days when you are physically depleted and the studio is not the answer. I get that. I’ve been there. Recently. But there is a meaningful difference between that and the habitual reach for the easy option out of habit. Most people are not distinguishing between those two things. And the research suggests it’s worth learning to tell them apart.
So let’s add all this up.
Making things with your hands at a level that challenges you produces neurochemical outcomes that passive consumption does not replicate. Never has. Never will. Effort-based rewards. Flow. Behavioral activation. All point to fine motor engagement and cognitive health over time. These are not warm and fuzzy wellness claims. They’re documented findings that all point in the same direction.
The work is the self-care. Not the preparation for it. Not something you earn by doing easier things first. It’s the thing itself.
And you now have the research to prove it. You know what making does for your brain and your body. You know that action comes before motivation. You know that choosing the phone over the studio is not a neutral decision - it’s a choice with documented neurological consequences.
What you do with that is yours to decide. Nobody else can make that call. But you're making a decision either way. Every day. Whether you're thinking about it consciously or not.
Your brain needs this. Not as a treat. Not as a reward for finishing everything else first.
It needs the effort. The visible result. The problem that requires your full attention. And not just any problem - the one that's sitting at the edge of what you can do. The project that makes you think. The piece where you're honestly not sure how it's going to turn out.
That's the session that does what the research says it does. Not the safe one. Not the comfort on repeat. The one where you show up and say okay - let's see what I've got today.
Because here's what I've noticed after thirty years of doing this. The makers who feel most alive in their work are not the ones doing the most. They're the ones who keep asking more of themselves. Who stay curious about what they might not know yet. Who treat every piece as a chance to get a little better rather than proof of how good they already are.
That pursuit - that reaching - isn’t just good for the work. The research says it's good for your brain, your mood, your long-term health. And the absence of it? That low grade blah-ness Lambert describes? That's not a mystery. That's what happens when you stop asking anything more of yourself.
You don't need to feel like it. You just need to start. Pick the harder project. The one that makes you slightly nervous. The one where you'll have to bring everything you've got.
That's the self-care nobody is talking about.
I'll see you right here next week.

87: Your Brain on Making

Join Our Free Trial